7 U.S. Code § 2016
L. 110–246, § 4115(a)(2), inserted heading, substituted “Benefits” for “Coupons”, and struck out before period at end “: Provided further, That eligible households using coupons to purchase food may receive cash in change therefor so long as the cash received does not equal or exceed the value of the lowest coupon denomination
Actived: 6 days ago
7 CFR § 249.10
(1) If the State agency elects to replace lost, stolen or damaged SFMNP coupons, it must describe its system for doing so in the State Plan. (2) The State agency must use uniform SFMNP coupons within its jurisdiction. (3) SFMNP coupons must include, at a minimum, the following information: (i) The last date by which the participant may use the
48 CFR § 552.203-71
Any advertisement by the Contractor, including price-off coupons, that refers to a military resale activity shall contain the following statement: “This advertisement is neither paid for nor sponsored, in whole or in part, by any element of the United States Government.”
CLARK v. IOWA CITY. Supreme Court US Law LII / Legal
For this interest ten coupons, or interest warrants in negotiable form, for $50 each, were annexed to the bonds. From ten of these bonds the coupons were subsequently cut off, and long before the commencement of this suit—which was on the 31st of January, 1874—were negotiated and by purchase and delivery became the property of a certain Clark.
CALIFORNIA, Petitioner v. Billy GREENWOOD and Dyanne Van
For example, a nationally syndicated consumer columnist has suggested that apartment dwellers obtain cents-off coupons by "mak[ing] friends with the fellow who handles the trash" in their buildings, and has recounted the tale of "the 'Rich lady' from Westmont who once a week puts on rubber gloves and hip boots and wades into the town garbage
COUNTY OF MORGAN v. ALLEN. Supreme Court US Law LII
Upon the return of that cause to the inferior State court a decree was entered (by consent of the creditors, Vail & Ladd, and the county) by which the county obtained possession of its bonds of the nominal value of $17,832.18, with coupons attached, in consideration of its paying off the judgments of Vail & Ladd, amounting to the sum already
THE CITY v. LAMSON. Supreme Court US Law LII / Legal
These coupons are, substantially, but copies from the body of the bond in respect to the interest, and, as is well known, are given to the holder of the bond for the purpose, first, of enabling him to collect the interest at the time and place mentioned without the trouble of presenting the bond every time it becomes due; and, second, to enable
42 CFR § 1001.952
(2) The seller is an individual or entity that supplies an item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under Medicare, Medicaid or other Federal health care programs to the buyer and who permits a discount to be taken off the buyer's purchase price. The seller must comply with all of the applicable standards within one
26 U.S. Code § 274
unless the taxpayer substantiates by adequate records or by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer’s own statement (A) the amount of such expense or other item, (B) the time and place of the travel or the date and description of the gift, (C) the business purpose of the expense or other item, and (D) the business relationship to the taxpayer of the person receiving the benefit.
12 CFR § 1026.41
(A) Has charged off the loan in accordance with loan-loss provisions and will not charge any additional fees or interest on the account; and (B) Provides, within 30 days of charge-off or the most recent periodic statement, a periodic statement, clearly and conspicuously labeled “Suspension of Statements & Notice of Charge Off - Retain This
26 U.S. Code § 461
Except as provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary, amounts paid to, or credited to the accounts of, depositors or holders of accounts as dividends or interest on their deposits or withdrawable accounts (if such amounts paid or credited are withdrawable on demand subject only to customary notice to withdraw) by a mutual savings bank not having capital stock represented by shares, a
LYTLE v. TOWN OF LANSING. Supreme Court US Law LII
This was six or eight weeks after the agreement was made. He cut off the July coupons in time for presentation for payment, and the January coupons as they became due, and sent them to the attorneys in New York to whom Mr. Stillman had recommended …
MARYE, Auditor, etc., and others v. PARSONS. Supreme
The coupons are tendered in payment, not as money, for they have no quality of money, but as a set-off which, as is insisted, the state has agreed to allow. The tax-payer stands on this agreement. That is the situation; and that is the whole of it.
ANTHONY v. COUNTY OF JASPER. Supreme Court US Law
Merwin delivered them during the same month, with the first two coupons cut off, to the Union Savings Bank of St. Louis, for the use of Edward Burgess, a contractor for building the road. In November, Burgess sold them to one Wilson at fifty-five cents on the dollar, and the bank gave them up to the purchaser on his order.
NATIONAL BANK v. GRAHAM. Supreme Court US Law LII
The cashier cut off and collected the coupons, and placed the proceeds to her credit. The bonds, therefore, entered into the legitimate and proper business of the institution. But it is unnecessary to pursue this view of the subject further, because we think there is another ground free from doubt upon which our judgment may be rested.
45 CFR § 156.270
(a) General requirement. A QHP issuer may only terminate enrollment in a QHP through the Exchange as permitted by the Exchange in accordance with § 155.430(b) of this subchapter. (See also § 147.106 of this subchapter for termination of coverage.) (b) Termination of coverage or enrollment notice requirement. If a QHP issuer terminates an enrollee's coverage or enrollment in a QHP through the
AMY v. DUBUQUE. Supreme Court US Law LII / Legal
The coupons in suit matured more than ten years prior to its commencement. Upon the non-payment, at maturity, of each coupon, the holder had a complete cause of action. In other words, he might have instituted his action to recover the amount thereof at their respective maturities.
LITTLE and others v. GILES and others. Supreme Court
Pillsbury, 114 U. S. 138, S. C. 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 807, where certain bonds of a municipal corporation were declared void by a state court as issued under an unconstitutional act, and thereupon the holders of some of the coupons cut them off, and transferred them to a citizen of another state at much less than their face value, and took his note
26 CFR § 1.197-2
The change must be made on a cut-off basis with no section 481(a) adjustment. Notwithstanding § 1.446-1(e)(3), a taxpayer should not file a Form 3115, “Application for Change in Accounting Method,” to obtain the consent of the Commissioner to change its method of …
CROMWELL v. COUNTY OF SAC. COUNTY OF SAC v. CROMWELL
2. As to the other two bonds in suit,—those payable in 1868 and 1869,—and coupons annexed, it appears that when Clark purchased them, on the 20th of May, 1863, there were attached to each the coupon due on the first of that month and all subsequent unmatured coupons.
HOLLISTER, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. BENEDICT
Thus, to indicate 126 gallons, 120 being the whole number of the stamp, the coupon slip is cut off between the numbers 6 and 7, and the piece so cut off is moistened on the back and permanently attached to the face of the stamp, the 6 being the significant figure of the coupon.
COLER v. CITY OF CLEBURNE. Supreme Court US Law LII
This is an action at law brought in the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Texas, by W. N. Coler, Jr., against the city of Cleburne, a municipal corporation of Texas, to recover on 234 coupons, of $35 each, amounting to $8,190, cut from a series o 51 bonds, of $1,000 each, purporting to have been executed and issued by that corporation.
COUNTY OF CARTER v. SINTON. Supreme Court US Law LII
3. Here the title is 'An act authorizing the county of Carter, and those parts of the counties of Boyd and Elliott taken from Carter county, to compromise and settle with the holders of the bonds and coupons of interest exc uted by Carter county in its subscription to the capital stock of the Lexington & Big Sandy Railroad Company, and to levy and collect a tax for that purpose.'
COUNTY OF DAVIESS v. DICKINSON. Supreme Court US Law
6 S.Ct. 897. 117 U.S. 657. 29 L.Ed. 1026. COUNTY OF DAVIESS v. DICKINSON. Filed April 12, 1886. This was an action brought April 3, 1879, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kentucky, by Dickinson against the county of Daviess, on bonds and coupons alleged to have been issued under the statute of Kentucky of February 27, 1867, (chapter 1505,) incorporating the
BOARD OF SUP'RS OF GRENADA CO. and others v. BROWN and
In 1872 and 1873 the county assessed and collected taxes to pay the coupons maturing at these respective periods on all the bonds in suit. The coupons for those years have been fully paid. The county, by its duly-accredited agent, was represented at all the stockholders' meetings of the company, and voted a stock subscription of $100,000.
UNITED STATES v. STATE OF LOUISIANA. Supreme Court US
This being so, it follows that the limitation of section 1069 of the Revised Statutes is a bar against the recovery of the item of $13,602.71 of the 5 per cent. fund, credited May 8, 1879, and that the amount of the set-off of $31,080, for coupons falling due up to November 1, 1887, on the Indian trust bonds, is a valid set-off against the
WOOD et al. v. GUARANTEE TRUST & SAFE DEPOSIT CO
He cut off the coupons that were due and unpaid, so long as the bonds remained in his possession, and put up some money to redeem coupons which fell due on bonds that had been sold, so long as he was still engaged in selling other bonds. It looks very much as if Mr. Starr had dug a pit, and was anxiously keeping the pathway to it in good order.
42 U.S. Code § 1786
Congress finds that substantial numbers of pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding women, infants, and young children from families with inadequate income are at special risk with respect to their physical and mental health by reason of inadequate nutrition or health care, or both. It is, therefore, the purpose of the program authorized by this section to provide, up to the authorization
PARSONS v. JACKSON. Supreme Court US Law LII / Legal
But it further appeared that none, or very few, of the coupons had been cut off from the bonds, and that the latter were imperfect in form. 9. Each bond, on its face, certifies 'that the Vicksburg, Shreveport, and Texas Railroad Company is indebted to John Ray, or bearer, for value received, in the sum of either £225 sterling or $1,000 lawful
CITY OF LEXINGTON v. BUTLER. Supreme Court US Law
With these statutes in force the city of Lexington, Kentucky, acting under the authority of an act of the legislature of Kentucky, issued in 1853 to the Lexington and Big Sandy Railroad Company, one hundred and fifty bonds, each for $1000, having thirty years to run, and bearing an interest of 6 per cent. per annum, payable semi-annually, for
18 U.S. Code § 1956
Pub. L. 102–550, § 1534(3), which directed insertion of “, any felony violation of section 9(c) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (relating to food stamp fraud) involving a quantity of coupons having a value of not less than $5,000, or any felony violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” before semicolon, was executed by making
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CORNELL. Supreme Court US Law
From other certificates, on which some ink-marks still appeared, he cut off the coupons, and pasted them over the partially effaced marks. In this condition no signs or marks of cancellation or redemption were visible on the certificates, but some of them still had a soiled or stained appearance. The stolen certificates were sold by Farnham to
PITTSBURGH, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. v. LONG ISLAND LOAN
The coupons maturing May 1, 1878, on these 36 bonds, which were attached to them when Lynde purchased, were paid to the latter by the firm of A. Iselin & Co., Wall street, New York, upon presentation by Lynde of the coupons in October, 1878; and the 36 coupons maturing November 1, 1878, were paid to Lynde by the same firm upon the presentation
21 CFR § 1140.16
(a) Restriction on product names. A manufacturer shall not use a trade or brand name of a nontobacco product as the trade or brand name for a cigarette or smokeless tobacco product, except for a tobacco product whose trade or brand name was on both a tobacco product and a nontobacco product that were sold in the United States on January 1, 1995. (b) Minimum cigarette package size.
28 CFR § 2.20
(a) Grade as Category Four, except as provided below. (b) If the relationship is clearly consensual and the victim is at least fourteen years old, and the age difference between the victim and offender is less than four years, grade as Category One. (c) If the victim is less than twelve years old, grade as Category Seven. (d) If the offender is an adult who has abused a position of trust (e.g
MCGAHEY v. STATE OF VIRGINIA. BRYAN v. SAME. COOPER v
Edmunds and other cases argued at the same time, decided in February, 1886, and reported in 116 U. S. 550, etc., 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 501, arise upon certain tax-receivable coupons attached to bonds of the state of Virginia, issued in reduction and liquidation of the state debt under the acts of March 30, 1871, and March 28, 1879. The present
25 CFR § 547.2
Non-volatile memory that retains its data when the power is turned off and that can be electronically erased and reprogrammed without being removed from the circuit board. Game software. The operational program or programs that govern the play, display of results, and/or awarding of prizes or credits for Class II games. Gaming equipment.
BARNUM v. TOWN OF OKOLONA. Supreme Court US Law LII
6. Frank D. Barnum, a citizen of Tennessee, brought an action of debt against the town of Okolona at the April term, 1889, of the district court of the United States for the northern district of Mississippi, and averred in his declaration that he was the holder and owner for value, and before the maturity thereof, of 16 bonds of said town, with their coupons attached, which were due and unpaid
JACKSON v. LUDELING. Supreme Court US Law LII
At the first cry the property was struck off to George M. Branner & Co. for $550,000; but because they failed to pay at once the interest coupons then due and presented, the sheriff immediately set up the property again in bulk, and sold and adjudicated it to John T. Ludeling, John Ray, Francis P. Stubbs, Wesley J. Q. Baker, William R. Gordon
THOMSON v. LEE COUNTY. Supreme Court US Law LII
The coupons attached were in a like negotiable shape; 'promises to pay to the bearer at the Continental Bank, in the city of New York, forty dollars interest on bond No. 1.' Soon after the bonds were issued the county laid a tax to meet the interest due on the coupons.
SUPERVISORS v. GALBRAITH. Supreme Court US Law LII
3 'This bond is one of a series of bonds issued and delivered to the Grenada, Houston, and Eastern Railroad Company by Calhoun County, to meet and pay off the amount subscribed by said county to the capital stock of the railroad company aforesaid in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Mississippi, entitled 'An Act to aid in the construction of the Grenada, Houston, and
NEW YORK, L. E. & W. R. CO. v. WINTER'S ADM'R. Supreme
4. We think these instructions perfectly correct, and that, upon these points, they embodied substantially the whole law of the case. The gravamen of this action is the wrongful conduct of the conductor who ejected the plaintiff from the train. Whether the plaintiff told nothing but the truth with reference to what occurred on the train between him and the conductor before he was put off and
BARNETT v. CITY OF DENISON. Supreme Court US Law LII
School Dist., 34 Kan. 237, 8 Pac. Rep. 208, relied upon by the plaintiff, the state sued a school district upon certain school-district bonds and their coupons. Upon the trial, the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence upon the petition, upon the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of
26 U.S. Code § 414
Except as provided in paragraph (2), for purposes of sections 401, 408(k), 408(p), 410, 411, 415, and 416, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, all employees of trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) which are under common control shall be treated as employed by a single employer.
UNITED STATES MORTGAGE CO. v. SPERRY et al. Supreme
6. On the 3d of March, 1873, the guardian presented another petition to the county court, showing that he had used $68,643.80 out of the above loan in paying off old mortgages on the minor's estate, leaving a balance of $126,002.58, which he estimated would all or nearly all be required in the construction of buildings then being erected on the Randolph-Street front of lot 6 in block 35, and
COMMISSIONERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY v. JANUARY. Supreme
This court has repeatedly held that paper otherwise negotiable, which on its face shows that which should arouse suspicion and put the taker upon inquiry, cannot be so transferred as to cut off defences which would have been available against the original holder. Fowler v. Brantly, 14 Pet. 318; Goodman v. Simonds, 20 How. 343; Angle v.
TOWN OF PANA v. BOWLER and another. Supreme Court US
This was an action of assumpsit brought by James H. Bowler and Isaac H. Merrill against the town of Pana, upon coupons cut from certain bonds issued by the town, dated June 23, 1873. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and the parties having waived a jury, submitted the case to the court upon the facts as well as the law.
RAILWAY COMPANY v. SPRAGUE. Supreme Court US Law LII
At the time of the exchange there were attached to each of the bonds which Mrs. Sprague received all the coupons, beginning from the date of the bonds, sixty in number. Of these coupons two, one payable Oct. 1, 1870, and one payable April 1, 1871, for thirty-five dollars each, were past due and unpaid.
BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF LABETTE CO., KANSAS, and …
That judgment was recovered upon coupons for unpaid interest on bonds, issued in the name and on behalf of Oswego township, by the board of county commissioners of Labette county, pursuant to the act of the legislature of the state, entitled 'An act to enable municipal townships to subscribe for stock in any railroad, and to provide for the